Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

64

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

61

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
Light-weight
Weight
206 g
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact (105×58×33 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
GPS No built-in GPS
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$344

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810

Super zoom

$350

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Travel zoom

$647

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Travel zoom

$118 - $148

Size Significantly smaller
Weight Significantly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments