Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix TZ25

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TZ25

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Travel zoom

$313

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ57

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ57

Travel zoom

$214

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Travel zoom

$306

GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$340

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom Much more zoom
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25
Lumix TZ25
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments