Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix TZ25

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

66

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25

57

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TZ25

HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
10 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Much more zoom
3D Takes 3D photos
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$287

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ10

Travel zoom

$911

High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$197

Zoom More zoom
Size Smaller
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ10

Travel zoom

$79 - $135

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Wider aperture
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ30

Panasonic Lumix TZ30

Travel zoom

$234

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
GPS Has a GPS
Fastest shutter speed Significantly slower max shutter speed

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ20
Lumix DMC-TZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ25
Lumix TZ25
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments