Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

66

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66

Large screen
Screen size
3.3"
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Really small
Size
Ultra compact (93×54×13 mm)
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS30

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Size
Really small
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix ZS30.
Explore our gallery of 10 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30

Waterproof

$228 - $259

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Waterproof Waterproof
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX55

Ultra compact

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Macro focus Much better macro capability
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Travel zoom

$209

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Touch screen No touch screen

Panasonic Lumix ZS30 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$298 - $329

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-TX66
Cybershot DSC-TX66
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix ZS30
Lumix ZS30
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments