Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V vs Panasonic Lumix TZ40

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

67

Panasonic Lumix TZ40

61

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V

Great battery life
Battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Long exposures
Longest exposure
30 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix TZ40

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Macro focus
Great macro
3.0 cm
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix TZ40.
Explore our gallery of 22 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$389 - $428

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
External flash No external flash support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Aperture Wider aperture
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Battery life Shorter battery life
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Aperture Much wider aperture
True resolution Much higher true resolution
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

Panasonic Lumix TZ40 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom More zoom
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ70

Travel zoom

$298

Zoom More zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX50V
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix TZ40
Lumix TZ40
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments