Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,228k dots
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Many focus points
Focus points
315
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
50 fps
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$565 - $679

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV

Pro digicam

$811 - $898

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F

Boutique

$1,190 - $1,299

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly slower

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$570 - $648

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$565 - $679

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments