Updated (July 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

47

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

Battery life
Great battery life
380 shots
Macro focus
Great macro
2.0 cm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$298

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$185

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Samsung WB110

Samsung WB110

Super zoom

$331

3D Takes 3D photos
Wide angle Better wide angle
True resolution Lower true resolution
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Super zoom

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Aperture Wider aperture
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20
Lumix DMC-LZ20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments