Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs Samsung EX2F

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

49

Samsung EX2F

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.4
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung EX2F

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.4
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung EX2F.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$609 - $698

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Leica D-Lux 6

Leica D-Lux 6

Pro digicam

$1,384

Continuous shooting Shoots slower

Samsung EX2F Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$498

Dynamic range More dynamic range
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Samsung TL500

Samsung TL500

Pro digicam

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$609 - $698

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Built-in flash No built-in flash

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Samsung EX2F
EX2F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Whitt (11:37 PM, February 13, 2013)
Zurich Int, I will check out you link. Thanx
 
Avatar for Ufupuw Ufupuw (10:56 PM, August 15, 2012)
The specs are just wrong. EX2F is neither smaller, nor thinner. It's just Samsung deceptive tactics of not including the lens when measuring the thickness.  (See the actual images side by side http://j.mp/NGko0N ) 

LX7 (and everyone else) includes lens thickness, but Samsung doesn't.  It's pure  deception from Samsung. 

So the specs on this page are just wrong. They are just using Samsung deceptive numbers.