Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs Samsung EX2F

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

81

Samsung EX2F

75

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung EX2F

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung EX2F.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Pro digicam

$700

Battery life Longer battery life
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

Samsung EX2F Competitors

Samsung WB850F

Samsung WB850F

Travel zoom

$528

GPS Has a GPS
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Samsung TL500

Samsung TL500

Pro digicam

$550

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Olympus SH-25MR

Olympus SH-25MR

Travel zoom

$248

GPS Has a GPS
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Samsung EX2F
EX2F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Whitt (11:37 PM, February 13, 2013)
Zurich Int, I will check out you link. Thanx
 
Avatar for Ufupuw Ufupuw (10:56 PM, August 15, 2012)
The specs are just wrong. EX2F is neither smaller, nor thinner. It's just Samsung deceptive tactics of not including the lens when measuring the thickness.  (See the actual images side by side http://j.mp/NGko0N ) 

LX7 (and everyone else) includes lens thickness, but Samsung doesn't.  It's pure  deception from Samsung. 

So the specs on this page are just wrong. They are just using Samsung deceptive numbers.