Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs Samsung EX2F

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

53

Samsung EX2F

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.7 EV
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Samsung EX2F

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Aperture
Wide aperture
f/1.4
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Samsung EX2F.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$80 - $648

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Samsung EX2F Competitors

Samsung TL500

Samsung TL500

Pro digicam

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Pro digicam

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Samsung EX2F
EX2F
Samsung

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Whitt (11:37 PM, February 13, 2013)
Zurich Int, I will check out you link. Thanx
 
Avatar for Ufupuw Ufupuw (10:56 PM, August 15, 2012)
The specs are just wrong. EX2F is neither smaller, nor thinner. It's just Samsung deceptive tactics of not including the lens when measuring the thickness.  (See the actual images side by side http://j.mp/NGko0N ) 

LX7 (and everyone else) includes lens thickness, but Samsung doesn't.  It's pure  deception from Samsung. 

So the specs on this page are just wrong. They are just using Samsung deceptive numbers.