Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

48

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Battery life
Great battery life
400 shots
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $598

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Leica D-Lux 6

Leica D-Lux 6

Pro digicam

$1,599

Continuous shooting Shoots slower

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

Leica D-LUX 5

Leica D-LUX 5

Pro digicam

$1,100

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Pro digicam

$199

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Slightly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
Lumix DMC-LX5
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments