Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.4
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
50 fps
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15) Competitors

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$649

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $598

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Pro digicam

$948 - $1,050

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Focus points Many more focus points
Touch screen No touch screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100) Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $598

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$649

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$429

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Slightly smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments