Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,040k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II

Movie format
Shoots UHD movies
UHD @ 30fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,040k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$493 body only

$616 with 14-42mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,276 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Larger
Leica X1

Leica X1

Boutique

$1,850

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

Digicam

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Touch screen No touch screen
Olympus TG-1 iHS

Olympus TG-1 iHS

Waterproof

Screen type Has an OLED screen
GPS Has a GPS
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,276 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7
Lumix DMC-GX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments