Updated (April 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 vs Sony NEX F3

Sony NEX F3 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Winner
Sony NEX F3

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

64

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony NEX F3

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Great battery life
Battery life
470 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Weight
Light-weight
267 g
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5.

competitors

Sony NEX F3 Competitors

Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Lowest price More expensive
Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$436 body only

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Size Slightly smaller
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Sony Alpha NEX-5

Sony Alpha NEX-5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 with 18-55mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Slightly smaller
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$591 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Size Significantly larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$195 body only

$354 with 14-42mm lens

Thickness Slightly thinner
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$436 body only

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay

discussion

Sony NEX F3
NEX F3
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5
Lumix DMC-GF5
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments