Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80

Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 30fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Really small
Size
Mid size (122×71×44 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Fastest shutter speed Slightly faster max shutter speed
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-TS7 (Lumix DC-FT7)

Digicam

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Touch screen No touch screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Boutique

$898

Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Placeholder

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Lens availability Much fewer lenses available
Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX850 (Lumix DC-GX800 / Lumix DC-GF9)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Viewfinder No viewfinder

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX80
Lumix DMC-GX80
Panasonic

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DMC-G7
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments