Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

127

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

100

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,036k dots
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.67x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6 Competitors

Sony SLT A58

Sony SLT A58

Entry-level DSLR

$330 body only

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Screen size Much smaller screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$864 with 14-42mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Supports 24p No 24p support
Nikon D7100

Nikon D7100

Entry-level DSLR

$709 body only

$1,097 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Competitors

Canon EOS Rebel T2i

Canon Rebel T2i

Entry-level DSLR

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Touch screen No touch screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$864 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$695

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G6
Lumix DMC-G6
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Lumix DMC-GH2
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments