Panasonic Lumix ZS30 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

Winner
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

36

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

33

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS30

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Battery life
Great battery life
450 shots
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60.
Explore our gallery of 8 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix ZS30.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix ZS30 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Zoom More zoom
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$274 - $298

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Significantly larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$298

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$364 - $449

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Much more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Panasonic Lumix ZS30
Lumix ZS30
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60
Lumix DMC-FZ60
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments