Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

88

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

59

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.7
Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 30fps
Really small
Size
Mid size (115×66×55 mm)
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.67x
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 10 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Boutique

$898

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX10 (Lumix DMC-LX15)

Pro digicam

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,276 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Travel zoom

$448

Size Much smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Aperture Narrower aperture
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SX740 HS

Travel zoom

$338 - $399

Size Much smaller
Thickness Much thinner
Touch screen No touch screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II

Super zoom

$898

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100
Lumix DMC-LX100
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments