Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

68

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 30fps
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,040k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
540 shots
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$640 - $798

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Touch screen No touch screen
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$369 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Size Smaller
Supports 24p No 24p support

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$215 - $257

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$350

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Lumix DMC-FZ300
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Lumix DMC-FZ200
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments