Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

87

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

74

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Great image quality
Overall image quality
64.0
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
High true resolution
True resolution
20.9 MP
Great color depth
Color depth
22.1 bits
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Movie format
Shoots UHD movies
UHD @ 30fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Super zoom

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Slightly larger
Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Super zoom

$1,195

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,398

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Heavier

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$398

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$369 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Size Smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Lumix DMC-FZ300
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments