Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

79

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
High true resolution
True resolution
20.9 MP
Large sensor
Sensor size
Nikon CX 13.2x8.8mm
Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 25fps
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Movie format
Shoots UHD movies
UHD @ 30fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Super zoom

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$479 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$333 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Size Smaller
Supports 24p No 24p support
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$289 - $549 body only

$329 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Lumix DMC-FZ300
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments