Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

87

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

71

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
High true resolution
True resolution
20.9 MP
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/16000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Light sensitivity
High ISO
25,600 ISO
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
True resolution
High true resolution
20 MP
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$499 - $598

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Super zoom

$1,195

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,398

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Heavier

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000) Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,398

Aperture Wider aperture
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen
Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Leica V-Lux (Typ 114)

Super zoom

$1,195

Size Slightly smaller
Weight Lighter
Touch screen No touch screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$499 - $598

Size Smaller
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Lumix DMC-FZ1000
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments