Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 vs Sony Alpha a6300

Placeholder
Sony Alpha a6300

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,240k dots
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.67x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a6300

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 120fps
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
120 fps
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9 Competitors

Canon EOS M5

Canon EOS M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$565 - $679 body only

$679 - $799 with 15-45mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Lens availability Much fewer lenses available
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Travel zoom

$448

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Size Smaller
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-G9

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,198 - $2,046 body only

$1,898 - $1,899 with 12-60mm lens

Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

Sony Alpha a6300 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$700 - $999 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Placeholder

Sony a6400

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$898 body only

$971 - $998 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Thickness Thicker

discussion

Placeholder
Lumix DC-GX9
Panasonic

Report a correction
Sony Alpha a6300
Alpha a6300
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments