Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 vs Panasonic Lumix DC-G9

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Really small
Size
Prosumer size (128×89×74 mm)
Light-weight
Weight
505 g
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-G9

Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.80x
Focus points
Many focus points
225
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,276 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$784 body only

$798 with 12-60mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing

Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Competitors

Placeholder

Olympus OM-D E-M1X

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,999 body only

$3,798 with 12-40mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Battery life Much longer battery life
Viewfinder size Smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-GX9

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$784 body only

$798 with 12-60mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Much smaller
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Pro DSLR

$949 - $1,399 body only

$1,275 - $1,799 with 18-135mm lens

Lens availability Much more lenses available
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85
Lumix DMC-G85
Panasonic

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DC-G9
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments