Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 vs Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

76

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

62

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.8
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Really small
Size
Compact (102×58×36 mm)
High true resolution
True resolution
20 MP
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Zoom
Great zoom
60x
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
20 mm
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$448

Wide angle Better wide angle
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$379

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha A5000

Sony Alpha A5000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$300 body only

$395 with 16-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$339 - $447

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Smaller
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$457 - $498

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom Much less zoom
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$349 - $479

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100
Cybershot DSC-RX100
Sony

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments