Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

70

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

67

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
20 mm
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
1.39x
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99

Travel zoom

$448

Size Significantly smaller
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SX70 HS

Super zoom

$499 - $549

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Size Significantly smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$469 - $597

Zoom More zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV

Super zoom

$1,598

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$368 - $449

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Panasonic

Report a correction
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments