Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 vs Pentax Q7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Pentax Q7

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
108 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax Q7

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Badge
Built-in focus motor
Autofocuses with more lenses
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Thickness
Thin
1.3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Pentax Q7.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$510 body only

$685 with 14-42mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$320 body only

$400 - $433 with 12-32mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External flash No external flash support
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Pro digicam

$699

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only

Pentax Q7 Competitors

Pentax Q10

Pentax Q10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$207 body only

$603 with 5-15mm, 15-45mm lenses

Supports 24p No 24p support
Pentax Q-S1

Pentax Q-S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$223 body only

$298 - $370 with 5-15mm lens

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$320 body only

$400 - $433 with 12-32mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Movie continuous focus Continuous video focus
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Lumix DMC-GX1
Panasonic

Report a correction
Pentax Q7
Q7
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments