Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 vs Pentax Q7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Pentax Q7

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
108 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax Q7

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Badge
Built-in focus motor
Autofocuses with more lenses
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.
Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Pentax Q7.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$350 body only

$390 with 12-32mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
External flash No external flash support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$685 body only

$748 with 14-42mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Dynamic range More dynamic range
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$312 body only

$380 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Overall image quality Worse image quality

Pentax Q7 Competitors

Pentax Q-S1

Pentax Q-S1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$223 - $247 body only

$347 - $359 with 5-15mm lens

Pentax Q10

Pentax Q10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$190 body only

$603 with 5-15mm, 15-45mm lenses

Supports 24p No 24p support
Pentax Q

Pentax Q

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$170 body only

$297 with 5-15mm lens

Movie continuous focus Continuous video focus
Thickness Slightly thinner
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Lumix DMC-GX1
Panasonic

Report a correction
Pentax Q7
Q7
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments