Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

81

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Screen size
Large screen
3"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Pro digicam

$700

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Supports 24p No 24p support
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot Pro1

Pro digicam

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$476

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Battery life Shorter battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Olympus PEN E-PL5

Olympus PEN E-PL5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $598

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
Lumix DMC-LX3
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
Lumix DMC-GF3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments