Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

62

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

57

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
920k dots
Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Large screen
Screen size
3"
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Size
Really small
Compact (108×67×33 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
264 g
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$106 body only

$280 with 14mm lens

External flash Supports an external flash
Thickness Slightly thinner
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Olympus PEN E-PL1

Olympus PEN E-PL1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$280 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
External flash Supports an external flash
Screen size Much smaller screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-GF10 (GF90)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Super zoom

$420

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$347 body only

True resolution Higher true resolution
External flash Supports an external flash
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100

Entry-level DSLR

$362 body only

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5
Lumix DMC-GF5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3
Lumix DMC-GF3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments