Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Winner
Placeholder

65

Placeholder

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
1400 ms startup delay
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
180 ms shutter lag
Really small
Size
Mid size (108×67×37 mm)
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Size
Really small
Compact (108×67×33 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
264 g
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$714 body only

True resolution Higher true resolution
External flash Supports an external flash
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G16

Pro digicam

$1,606

Image stabilization Image stabilization
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Placeholder

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448 - $650

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$1,299

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Placeholder

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$675 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Touch screen No touch screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$655 with 14-42mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Placeholder
Lumix DMC-GF5
Panasonic

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DMC-GF3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments