Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Winner
Placeholder

67

Placeholder

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

High true resolution
True resolution
16 MP
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
1400 ms startup delay
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

Size
Really small
Compact (108×67×33 mm)
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
264 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
True resolution Lower true resolution
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$576 - $613 with 12-32mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$300 with 14mm lens

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Slightly smaller
True resolution Lower true resolution

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$1,299

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Placeholder

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$675 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Touch screen No touch screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$655 with 14-42mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Placeholder
Lumix DMC-GX1
Panasonic

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DMC-GF3
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments