Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

34

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

33

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Battery life
Great battery life
400 shots
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$307 - $398

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$220

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$257 - $297

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Wide angle Better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$317 - $319

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Super zoom

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47
Lumix DMC-FZ47
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments