Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

34

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

33

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47

Battery life
Great battery life
400 shots
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix SZ9

Panasonic Lumix SZ9

Travel zoom

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$299

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60

Super zoom

$387

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX20V

Travel zoom

$391

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Super zoom

$490

Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ47
Lumix DMC-FZ47
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments