Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 vs Pentax K-x

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

61

Pentax K-x

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-x

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (123×92×68 mm)
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Color depth
Great color depth
22.8 bits
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
97 ms shutter lag

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Pentax K-x.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35

Super zoom

$725

Size Slightly smaller
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P520

Nikon Coolpix P520

Super zoom

$360

Zoom More zoom
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Super zoom

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Size Significantly larger

Pentax K-x Competitors

Pentax K-r

Pentax K-r

Entry-level DSLR

$489 body only

$488 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Pentax K-5

Pentax K-5

Entry-level DSLR

$1,549 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Screen size Much larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Pentax K-3 II

Pentax K-3 II

Entry-level DSLR

$829 - $830 body only

$1,424 with 16-85mm lens

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction
Pentax K-x
K-x
Pentax

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments