Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

66

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
20 mm
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
12 fps
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Battery life
Great battery life
410 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82) Competitors

Placeholder

Nikon Coolpix P1000

Super zoom

$997

Zoom Much more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$398 - $420

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$239 - $257

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Super zoom

$420

Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$529

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$598 - $798

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments