Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.5
Large screen
Screen size
3.5"
Really small
Size
Super compact (99×56×20 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Size
Really small
Compact (105×58×33 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$344

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much smaller screen
Fujifilm FinePix S9100

Fujifilm FinePix S9100

Pro digicam

$399

Storage slots Has more storage slots
External flash Supports an external flash
Size Much larger
Sony Cybershot DSC-W580

Sony Cybershot W580

Compact

Storage slots Has more storage slots
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Canon PowerShot SX720 HS

Travel zoom

$260 - $349

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Lumix DMC-FX78
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
Lumix ZS15
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments