Updated (January 2012): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

55

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.5
Large screen
Screen size
3.5"
Really small
Size
Super compact (99×56×20 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS15

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 7 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 Competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-W580

Sony Cybershot W580

Compact

Storage slots Has more storage slots
Size Slightly smaller
Screen size Much smaller screen
Fujifilm FinePix JZ700

Fujifilm FinePix JZ700

Travel zoom

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W830

Travel zoom

$118 - $130

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen size Much smaller screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Canon PowerShot SX620 HS

Travel zoom

$229

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots slower
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

Travel zoom

$1,661

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Lowest price Much more expensive

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Lumix DMC-FX78
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15
Lumix ZS15
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments