Updated (January 2011): Compare the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

56

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

41

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/2.5
Large screen
Screen size
3.5"
Really small
Size
Super compact (99×56×20 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.8"
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/4000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75

Compact

$536

Aperture Wider aperture
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Screen size Much smaller screen
Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

Ultra compact

$107 - $120

Size Smaller
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 140 IS

Travel zoom

Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
Weight Slightly lighter
Screen size Much smaller screen

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$411

Zoom Much more zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Much larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$348

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Lumix DMC-FX78
Panasonic

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments