Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Olympus mju Tough 8010 vs Panasonic Lumix FT25

vs

Olympus mju Tough 8010

65

Olympus mju Tough 8010

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix FT20

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
25 mm
Size
Really small
Super compact 101x58x19 mm
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Size
Really small
Compact 95x62x22 mm
Macro focus
Great macro
1 cm
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Report a correction
Macro focus Significantly better macro capability 1 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 5x closer to the lens
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Learn more about
the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Advantages of the Panasonic FT20

Report a correction
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Battery life Longer battery life 260 shots vs 200 shots
Help
30% more shots per battery charge
Size Smaller 101x58x19 mm vs 95x62x22 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Weight Significantly lighter 142 g vs 215 g
Help
More than 30% lighter
Thickness Thinner 0.7" vs 0.9"
Help
More than 10% thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 1.3 fps vs 0.3 fps
Help
Around 4.5x faster continuous shooting
Longest exposure Longer exposures 8s vs 1/4s
Help
32x longer exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20 Learn more about
the Panasonic FT20
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent waterproof cameras, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Olympus mju Tough 8010 65

vs

68 Panasonic Lumix FT20 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Size Fairly small Help
mju Tough 8010:95x62x22 mm
FT20:101x58x19 mm
Waterproof Waterproof Help
Great at the beach
Thickness Thin Help
mju Tough 8010:0.9"
FT20:0.7"
Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
CCD
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Light sensitivity (boost) One has boost ISO Help
mju Tough 8010:None
FT20:6,400 ISO
HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
You could do HDR manually
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
mju Tough 8010:0.3 fps
FT20:1.3 fps
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
230k dots
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/3.9
Screen size Very small screens Help
2.7"
Movie format HD (720p) video Help
mju Tough 8010:720p
FT20:720p @ 30fps
Zoom Poor zoom Help
mju Tough 8010:5x
FT20:4x

Compared to recent waterproof cameras

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
Usually standard
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
mju Tough 8010:Sensor shift
FT20:Lens
GPS No built-in GPS Help
Missing geo-tagging
External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
Not supported
Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
mju Tough 8010:28 mm
FT20:25 mm

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Waterproof

$250 - $297

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
Weight Is slightly heavier
Size Is slightly larger
Olympus TG-820 iHS

Olympus TG-820

Waterproof

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
Thickness Is thicker
Size Is slightly larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

Waterproof

Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is slightly heavier
Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

Waterproof

$309

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
Thickness Is thicker
Weight Is significantly heavier

Olympus mju Tough 8010 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Olympus Tough TG-810

Olympus Tough TG-810

Waterproof

$299 - $329

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Larger screen
Size Larger
Macro focus Worse macro capability
Olympus mju Tough 6020

Olympus mju Tough 6020

Waterproof

Weight Significantly lighter
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

Waterproof

$249

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Significantly larger
Thickness Thicker
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-3

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-3

Waterproof

$319

Aperture Much wider aperture
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Significantly larger
Thickness Thicker

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Panasonic Lumix FT25

Panasonic Lumix FT25

Waterproof

$183

Longest exposure Much longer exposures
Size Slightly larger
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Waterproof

$213

Screen type Has an OLED screen
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Significantly larger
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT4

Panasonic Lumix FT4

Waterproof

Aperture Wider aperture
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Significantly larger
Wide angle Worse wide angle
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

Waterproof

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Panasonic Lumix FT5

Panasonic Lumix FT5

Waterproof

$298

Aperture Wider aperture
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Significantly larger
Wide angle Worse wide angle

appearance

Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20

discussion

Olympus mju Tough 8010
mju Tough 8010
Olympus

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
Lumix FT20
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments