Updated (January, 2013): Compare the Olympus mju Tough 8010 vs Panasonic Lumix FT25

vs

Olympus mju Tough 8010

62

Olympus mju Tough 8010

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix FT20

Size
Really small
Super compact 101x58x19 mm
Thickness
Thin
0.7"
Weight
Light-weight
142 g
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Size
Really small
Compact 95x62x22 mm
Macro focus
Great macro
1 cm
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Report a correction
Macro focus Better macro capability 1 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 5x closer to the lens
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Learn more about
the Olympus mju Tough 8010

Advantages of the Panasonic FT20

Report a correction
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Wide angle Better wide angle 25 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Battery life Longer battery life 260 shots vs 200 shots
Help
30% more shots per battery charge
Size Smaller 101x58x19 mm vs 95x62x22 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Weight Significantly lighter 142 g vs 215 g
Help
More than 30% lighter
Thickness Thinner 0.7" vs 0.9"
Help
More than 10% thinner
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 1.3 fps vs 0.3 fps
Help
Around 4.5x faster continuous shooting
Longest exposure Longer exposures 8s vs 1/4s
Help
32x longer exposures
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20 Learn more about
the Panasonic FT20
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent waterproof cameras, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Olympus mju Tough 8010 Olympus mju Tough 8010 62

vs

67 Panasonic Lumix FT20 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        similarities

        Compared to recent compacts

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
        Size Fairly small Help
        mju Tough 8010:95x62x22 mm
        FT20:101x58x19 mm
        Waterproof Waterproof Help
        Great at the beach
        Thickness Thin Help
        mju Tough 8010:0.9"
        FT20:0.7"
        Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
        CCD
        Light sensitivity (boost) One has boost ISO Help
        mju Tough 8010:None
        FT20:6,400 ISO
        Supports RAW No RAW support Help
        Less editing fidelity
        Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
        mju Tough 8010:0.3 fps
        FT20:1.3 fps
        HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
        You could do HDR manually
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,600 ISO
        Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
        230k dots
        Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
        f/3.9
        Screen size Very small screens Help
        2.7"
        High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
        Not supported
        Movie format HD (720p) video Help
        mju Tough 8010:720p
        FT20:720p @ 30fps
        Zoom Poor zoom Help
        mju Tough 8010:5x
        FT20:4x

        Compared to recent waterproof cameras

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
        Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
        Usually standard
        GPS No built-in GPS Help
        Missing geo-tagging
        External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
        Limited to the in-camera mic
        Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
        mju Tough 8010:28 mm
        FT20:25 mm

        competitors

        Shared Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Nikon Coolpix AW110

        Nikon Coolpix AW110

        Waterproof

        $218

        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier
        Olympus TG-320

        Olympus Tough TG-320

        Waterproof

        $150

        Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
        3D Captures 3D images
        Thickness Is thicker
        Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
        Olympus Stylus Tough TG-3

        Olympus Stylus Tough TG-3

        Waterproof

        $319

        Aperture Has a much wider aperture
        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is significantly heavier
        Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10

        Sony Cybershot TX10

        Waterproof

        $279

        Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

        Waterproof

        Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
        Longest exposure Much longer exposures
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier
        Nikon Coolpix AW100

        Nikon Coolpix AW100

        Waterproof

        $238 - $300

        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier

        Olympus mju Tough 8010 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Olympus Tough TG-810

        Olympus Tough TG-810

        Waterproof

        $441

        Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
        Screen size Larger screen
        Size Larger
        Macro focus Worse macro capability
        Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

        Olympus Tough TG-830 iHS

        Waterproof

        $247 - $249

        Movie format Higher resolution movies
        High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
        Size Significantly larger
        Macro focus Worse macro capability
        Olympus mju 830 Digital

        Olympus mju 830 Digital

        Compact

        Continuous shooting Shoots faster
        Weight Lighter
        Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
        Movie format Lower resolution movies
        Olympus mju Tough 6020

        Olympus mju Tough 6020

        Waterproof

        Weight Significantly lighter
        Continuous shooting Shoots faster
        Olympus mju Tough 8000

        Olympus mju Tough 8000

        Waterproof

        Aperture Wider aperture
        Image stabilization Better image stabilization
        Movie format Lower resolution movies
        Macro focus Slightly worse macro capability

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Panasonic Lumix FT25

        Panasonic Lumix FT25

        Waterproof

        $190

        Longest exposure Much longer exposures
        Lowest price Slightly cheaper
        Size Slightly larger
        Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT4

        Panasonic Lumix FT4

        Waterproof

        Aperture Wider aperture
        3D Takes 3D photos
        Size Significantly larger
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Fujifilm FinePix XP70

        Fujifilm FinePix XP70

        Waterproof

        $158 - $258

        Movie format Higher resolution movies
        Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
        Size Significantly larger
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Panasonic Lumix FT5

        Panasonic Lumix FT5

        Waterproof

        $543

        Aperture Wider aperture
        3D Takes 3D photos
        Size Significantly larger
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

        Waterproof

        Aperture Wider aperture
        Continuous shooting Shoots faster
        Wide angle Much worse wide angle
        Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching

        appearance

        Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
        Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
        Olympus mju Tough 8010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20

        discussion

        Olympus mju Tough 8010
        mju Tough 8010
        Olympus

        Report a correction
        Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT20
        Lumix FT20
        Panasonic

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments