Olympus
mju Tough 6010
 vs
Panasonic Lumix
DMC-FT1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1

69

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1

Size
 Really small
Compact 98x63x23 mm
Light sensitivity (boost)
 High ISO (boost)
6,400 ISO
Fastest shutter speed
 Fast shutter speed
1/3000 of a second
Longest exposure
 Long exposures
60 seconds
Olympus mju Tough 6010

60

Reasons to buy the Olympus mju Tough 6010

Built-in flash
 Built-in flash
Usually standard
Size
 Really small
Compact 95x63x22 mm
Thickness
 Thin
0.9"

differences

Advantages of the Olympus mju Tough 6010
Built-in flash Built-in flash Yes vs No
Help
 A built-in flash is useful for taking indoor shots where there is little light
Macro focus Better macro capability 2 cm vs 5 cm
Help
 Focus on subjects 2.5x closer to the lens
Size Slightly smaller 95x63x22 mm vs 98x63x23 mm
Help
 Around 10% smaller
True resolution Slightly higher true resolution 9.8 MP vs 9.8 MP
Help
 Almost the same
Weight Slightly lighter 179 g vs 189 g
Help
 Around 10% lighter
Thickness Slightly thinner 0.9" vs 0.9"
Help
 Almost the same
Olympus mju Tough 6010 Learn more about
the Olympus mju Tough 6010

Advantages of the Panasonic DMC-FT1
Movie format Higher resolution movies 720p @ 30fps vs 480p @ 30fps
Help
 Shoots high resolution HD (720p) video
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.3 vs f/3.5
Help
 At its widest zoom, the DMC-FT1's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
 Less risk of blur
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO 6,400 ISO vs None
Help
 Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image
Longest exposure Much longer exposures 60s vs 1/4s
Help
 240x longer exposures
Fastest shutter speed Significantly faster max shutter speed 1/3000s vs 1/2000s
Help
 More than 30% faster max shutter speed
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1 Learn more about
the Panasonic DMC-FT1
vs

recommendations

Relative to the best recent waterproof cameras, and ignoring price

Olympus mju Tough 6010 Olympus mju Tough 6010
60 vs 69
Explain scores
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1
Green arrow Snapsort recommends the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1.

performance Which camera has better performance? Cast your vote!

Olympusmju Tough 6010
 Olympus mju Tough 6010 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1
PanasonicLumix DMC-FT1
Uses Travel score Travel
On holiday or vacation
0
0
Vote Vote
Sports score Sports
Fast action, sometimes indoors
0
0
Vote Vote
Features Low light image quality Low light image quality
Lack of noise, sharp details
0
0
Vote Vote
Color accuracy Color accuracy
White balance in varied lighting
0
0
Vote Vote
Autofocus peformance Still image focusing
Speed and accuracy
0
0
Vote Vote
Autofocus performance Video focusing
Speed and accuracy
0
0
Vote Vote
Manual controls Manual settings
How quickly and easily you can change settings
0
0
Vote Vote
Performance Image stabilization
Ability to reduce blur from hand shake
0
0
Vote Vote
Green arrow Join in the discussion below!

similarities

Compared to recent compacts

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Waterproof Waterproof Help
Great at the beach
Weight Heavy Help
mju Tough 6010:179 g
DMC-FT1:189 g
Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
CCD
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
1,600 ISO
Screen size Very small screens Help
2.7"
Touch screen No touchscreens Help
More buttons
Movie format Poor movies Help
mju Tough 6010:480p @ 30fps
DMC-FT1:720p @ 30fps
Zoom Poor zoom Help
mju Tough 6010:3.6x
DMC-FT1:4.6x

Compared to recent waterproof cameras

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Size Fairly small Help
mju Tough 6010:95x63x22 mm
DMC-FT1:98x63x23 mm
Fastest shutter speed Fast max shutter speeds Help
mju Tough 6010:1/2000s
DMC-FT1:1/3000s
GPS No built-in GPS Help
Missing geo-tagging
Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
230k dots

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT10

Waterproof

$241 - $283
Lowest price Is much less expensive
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Macro focus Slightly worse macro focusing
Compare the Lumix DMC-FT10 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the Lumix DMC-FT10 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Waterproof

$297 - $300
Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a significantly larger screen
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Size Is slightly larger
Compare the Coolpix AW100 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the Coolpix AW100 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Olympus TG-610

Olympus TG-610

Waterproof

$250 - $279
Screen size Has a significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Has a significantly higher resolution screen
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Thickness Is thicker
Compare the TG-610 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the TG-610 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Olympus TG-310

Olympus TG310

Waterproof

$180
Continuous shooting Shoots faster continuously
Weight Is slightly lighter
Compare the TG310 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the TG310 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Olympus mju Tough 3000

Olympus mju Tough 3000

Waterproof
Weight Is slightly lighter
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Compare the mju Tough 3000 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the mju Tough 3000 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Waterproof

$139 - $240
Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
GPS Has a built-in GPS
Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
Macro focus Much worse macro focusing
Compare the FinePix XP30 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the FinePix XP30 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Canon PowerShot D10

Canon PowerShot D10

Waterproof

$245 - $319
Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
Light sensitivity Slightly higher maximum light sensitivity
Thickness Is thicker
Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
Compare the PowerShot D10 vs the mju Tough 6010
Compare the PowerShot D10 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1

Olympus mju Tough 6010 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages
Olympus mju Tough 8010

Olympus mju Tough 8010

Waterproof
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Weight Heavier
Compare the mju Tough 8010 vs the mju Tough 6010
Canon Powershot S100

Canon Powershot S100

Pro digicam

$414 - $430
Aperture Much wider aperture
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Waterproof Not waterproof
Compare the Powershot S100 vs the mju Tough 6010
Samsung WP10

Samsung WP10

Waterproof
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Smaller
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Compare the WP10 vs the mju Tough 6010
Olympus mju 820 Digital

Olympus mju 820 Digital

Compact
Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
True resolution Much lower true resolution
Compare the mju 820 Digital vs the mju Tough 6010

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT3

Waterproof

$234 - $485
Built-in flash Built-in flash
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Thickness Thicker
Compare the Lumix DMC-FT3 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT2

Waterproof

$337 - $578
Built-in flash Built-in flash
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Size Slightly larger
Fastest shutter speed Much slower max shutter speed
Compare the Lumix DMC-FT2 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1
Sony Cybershot DSC-TX10

Sony Cybershot TX10

Waterproof

$265 - $299
Built-in flash Built-in flash
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Aperture Narrower aperture
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Compare the Cybershot TX10 vs the Lumix DMC-FT1

appearance

Olympus mju Tough 6010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1
Olympus mju Tough 6010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1
Olympus mju Tough 6010 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FT1

Find similar cameras

Here are some links to help you find other cameras with similar features to both of these:

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at Snapsort is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these cameras here, and discuss feedback for Snapsort at our support community.

Showing 0 comments