Olympus SP-590 UZ vs Stylus 820

differences

Advantages of the Olympus SP-590 UZ

Much better wide angle

26 mm

36 mm

Around 30% better wide angle

Much more zoom

26x

More than 27x more zoom

Image stabilization

Sensor shift, Lens

None

Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements

Wider aperture

f/2.8

f/3.3

At its widest zoom, the SP-590 UZ's lens captures marginally more light (0.5 f-stops)

Much higher true resolution

9.8 MP

8.1 MP

Capture more than 20% more detail in your photos

Has boost ISO

6,400 ISO

None

Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image

Has a viewfinder

Digital

None

A viewfinder can help save battery life by keeping the screen turned off

Better macro capability

1 cm

3 cm

Focus on subjects 3x closer to the lens

Better maximum light sensitivity

1,600 ISO

400 ISO

The SP-590 UZ's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better

Longer exposures

15s

Around 4x longer exposures

Learn more about
the Olympus SP-590 UZ

Advantages of the Olympus Stylus 820

Much smaller

96x56x24 mm

116x84x81 mm

6.1x smaller

Much thinner

0.9"

3.2"

3.4x thinner

Significantly lighter

165 g

413 g

2.5x lighter

Shoots slightly faster

7 fps

6 fps

Around 20% faster continuous shooting

Learn more about
the Olympus Stylus 820

recommendations

Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

Olympus SP-590 UZ

39	vs	26
Explain scores

Olympus Stylus 820

Snapsort recommends the Olympus SP-590 UZ. This recommendation, however, should be taken with a grain of salt since it doesn't always make sense to compare a super zoom with a compact.

advice

Need help deciding?

Ask the community!

I am considering either the SP-590 UZ or the Stylus 820,

For example: Taking photos in low light or great family photos or ability to take great photos underwater

Select aspects that are most important to you: (max 3)

Popular tags:

low light
general photography
Outdoors
family photos
distant subjects
fast action
video
wildlife
beginner
macro photography
sports
natural light
indoor
travel
professional
action shots
amateur
first camera
portraits
landscapes
children
HD video
vacation
Image quality
large prints
flash
Underwater
artistic photography
nature photos
street photography
fashion photography
wide angle
bokeh
casual use
panoramas
Portrait Photography
ease of use
night photography
wedding photography
creative
intermediate
nature
auto focus and speed
concert photography
Landscape
portrait
quality
slow motion
zoom
high fps
hiking
hobby
manual controls
product photography
sharp pictures
Size
snapshots
Artwork
costs
DSLR
durable
event photography
Fast
food photography
Good quality
gps
HDR
High Speed Golf Swing
Lens
Lightweight
outdoor
people and seascapes
pets
speed
superzoom
urban environment
versatilty
viewfinder
Which DSLR?
3D images
60 fps
ad_tech
architectural
architecture
asddasf
audio
Baby Shot
Birds
blackboard
Bmx
burst mode
canon s100 or the nikonp510
casual photography
commercial photography
compact
computer software
d5100 d3200 picture quality
Detail
downgrade
Easy to use
enthusiast
fashion photos
features
films better
fotos da família
f stop low
gift
good quality photos
help
high quality
Image stabilization
iso
large file size
lomography
long lasting
look
nikon d3100 d7000 canon
Nikon D3200 or the Sony SLT A77
not to expensive
off camera lighting
photowalks
Portability
pouca luz
qualité de l'image
refresh rate
resolution
Safari
second camera
sensor dust protection
short lag time
sight seeing
Simple
storage
surfing
upgrade
value
variety use
viajar
weather
website
weight
which one is best
Burst
juicy colors

similarities

Compared to recent digicams

Common Strengths

Common Weaknesses

Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

	Neither camera stitches together panoramas
	You could stitch photos in post

	Lower-end sensor types
	CCD

	Movie support
	480p @ 30fps

	Neither has in-camera HDR
	You could do HDR manually

	Very small screens
	2.7"

Poor maximum light sensitivity

SP-590 UZ:	1,600 ISO
Stylus 820:	400 ISO

	Neither camera can take 3D photos
	No 3d support

	No touchscreens
	More buttons

	Low resolution screens
	230k dots

competitors

Olympus SP-800 UZ

Super zoom

$379

Has slightly more zoom

Records lower quality movies

Is thicker

Is much heavier

Compare the SP-800 UZ vs the SP-590 UZ

Compare the SP-800 UZ vs the Stylus 820

Olympus SP-810 UZ

Super zoom

$269

Has way more more zoom

Records lower quality movies

Has a slower max shutter speed

Is thicker

Compare the SP-810 UZ vs the SP-590 UZ

Compare the SP-810 UZ vs the Stylus 820

Nikon Coolpix L120

Super zoom

$180 - $215

Records lower quality movies

Has a significantly larger screen

Is thicker

Is significantly heavier

Compare the Coolpix L120 vs the SP-590 UZ

Compare the Coolpix L120 vs the Stylus 820

Nikon Coolpix P510

Super zoom

$397 - $400

Much more zoom

Higher resolution movies

Narrower aperture

Larger

Compare the Coolpix P510 vs the SP-590 UZ

Olympus SP-570 UZ

Super zoom

$318

Shoots RAW

Supports an external flash

Less zoom

Shorter max exposures

Compare the SP-570 UZ vs the SP-590 UZ

Olympus D-580 Zoom

Compact

Significantly smaller

Significantly thinner

Much lower true resolution

Much worse wide angle

Compare the D-580 Zoom vs the SP-590 UZ

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

$300

Higher resolution movies

Much more zoom

Significantly narrower aperture

Larger

Compare the Coolpix P500 vs the SP-590 UZ

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

$438 - $500

Higher resolution movies

Has a flip-out screen

Much larger

Much heavier

Compare the FinePix HS30 EXR vs the SP-590 UZ

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Waterproof

$280

Much better wide angle

Higher resolution movies

Significantly narrower aperture

Shoots slower

Compare the Coolpix AW100 vs the Stylus 820

Panasonic Lumix TS4

Waterproof

$274 - $400

Much better wide angle

Higher resolution movies

Shoots slower

Worse macro capability

Compare the Lumix TS4 vs the Stylus 820

Sony Cybershot DSC-W620

Compact

$118

Much better wide angle

Much higher true resolution

Shoots slower

Worse macro capability

Compare the Cybershot DSC-W620 vs the Stylus 820

Olympus Stylus 830

Compact

Image stabilization

Smaller screen

Lower true resolution

Compare the Stylus 830 vs the Stylus 820

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Waterproof

$114 - $159

Much better wide angle

Image stabilization

Significantly narrower aperture

Significantly worse macro capability

Compare the FinePix XP30 vs the Stylus 820

appearance

“This combination of Renaissance Faire and photo stats sets our nerdy hearts aflutter. Now, have at you, Sir Nikon!” - Photojojo	“Absolutely love this site for camera comparison, makes well known consumer rating sites look rudimentary” - @chris2pherlynn
“Killer web-app for camera nerds.” - Besser Wisser	“I'm still in love with Snapsort” - @JustinMoodie
“This is the Google of the camera review websites” - Karel Donk, Photographer	“The site works hard to simplify a complex topic” - Janice Chen, ZDNet

OlympusSP-590 UZ vs Olympus Stylus820

Olympus SP-590 UZ

Reasons to buy the Olympus SP-590 UZ

Olympus Stylus 820

Reasons to buy the Olympus Stylus 820

recommendations

Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

differences

Advantages of the Olympus SP-590 UZ

Advantages of the Olympus Stylus 820

recommendations

Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

advice

Need help deciding?

similarities

Compared to recent digicams

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Olympus SP-800 UZ

Olympus SP-810 UZ

Nikon Coolpix L120

Olympus SP-590 UZ Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Coolpix P510

Olympus SP-570 UZ

Olympus D-580 Zoom

Nikon Coolpix P500

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Olympus Stylus 820 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Coolpix AW100

Panasonic Lumix TS4

Sony Cybershot DSC-W620

Olympus Stylus 830

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

appearance

discussion

Showing 0 comments

Olympus
SP-590 UZ
vs
Olympus Stylus
820