Updated (June, 2011): Compare the Olympus PEN E-PL2 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

vs

Olympus PEN E-PL1

38

Olympus PEN E-PL1

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Touch screen
Touch screen
Less buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1000 ms startup delay
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus PEN E-PL1

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
Sensor shift
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
 
Differences | Recommendations | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Olympus PEN E-PL1

Report a correction
Image stabilization Image stabilization Sensor shift vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Color depth Better color depth 21.5 bits vs 21.2 bits
Help
Distinguishes 0.3 more bits of color
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Learn more about
the Olympus PEN E-PL1

Advantages of the Panasonic DMC-GF2

Report a correction
Shutter lag Much less shutter lag 337 ms vs 820 ms
Help
2.4x less delay when taking photos
3D Takes 3D photos Yes vs No
Help
Combines multiple photos into a 3D image
Touch screen Has a touch screen Yes vs No
Help
Fewer buttons to worry about and direct interaction with camera menus
Movie format Higher resolution movies 1080p @ 30fps vs 720p @ 30fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution Full HD (1080p) video
Movie continuous focus Continuous video focus Yes vs No
Help
Record movies without worrying about focus
Screen size Larger screen 3.0" vs 2.7"
Help
More than 10% larger screen
Startup delay Significantly less startup delay 1000 ms vs 2200 ms
Help
2.2x less delay when turning on
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 460k dots vs 230k dots
Help
2x higher resolution screen
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed 1/4000s vs 1/2000s
Help
2x faster max shutter speed
Size Smaller 113x68x33 mm vs 115x72x42 mm
Help
Around 30% smaller
Dynamic range More dynamic range 10.3 EV vs 10.1 EV
Help
0.2 f-stops more dynamic range
Focus points Slightly more focus points 23 vs 11
Help
Set focus accurately within the frame
Thickness Thinner 1.3" vs 1.7"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Battery life Slightly longer battery life 300 shots vs 290 shots
Help
Almost the same
Lowest price Cheaper $249.95 vs $549.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $300 cheaper (2.2x less)
Weight Slightly lighter 310 g vs 334 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Learn more about
the Panasonic DMC-GF2
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent mirrorless cameras, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus PEN E-PL1 38
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        41 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent mirrorless cameras

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Lens availability Many lenses available Help
              40 lenses
              Sensor cleaning Self cleaning sensors Help
              Avoids dust in your photos
              Longest exposure Very long exposure times Help
              60 seconds
              External flash Each supports an external flash Help
              Better lighting
              Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
              External flash not needed
              Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
              PEN E-PL1:1/2000s
              DMC-GF2:1/4000s
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Dynamic range Poor dynamic range Help
              PEN E-PL1:10.1 EV
              DMC-GF2:10.3 EV
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Light sensitivity (boost) No boost ISO Help
              Lacks boost light sensitivity
              Cross type focus points Few cross-type focus points Help
              0
              True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
              PEN E-PL1:12.2 MP
              DMC-GF2:12 MP
              Supports 24p No support for 24p Help
              Missing that film look
              Focus points Few focus points Help
              PEN E-PL1:11
              DMC-GF2:23
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              PEN E-PL1:230k dots
              DMC-GF2:460k dots
              Shutter lag Significant shutter lag Help
              PEN E-PL1:820 ms
              DMC-GF2:337 ms
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic
              Battery life Few shots per battery charge Help
              PEN E-PL1:290 shots
              DMC-GF2:300 shots
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Sensor size Very small sensors Help
              Four thirds 17.3x13.0mm
              Overall image quality Low image quality Help
              54.0
              Color depth Poor color depth Help
              PEN E-PL1:21.5 bits
              DMC-GF2:21.2 bits
              Weather sealed Neither is weather sealed Help
              Need to shelter it from weather
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              PEN E-PL1:3 fps
              DMC-GF2:3.2 fps
              Low light performance Above average noise at high ISO Help
              PEN E-PL1:487 ISO
              DMC-GF2:506 ISO

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $150 body only

              $300 with 14-42mm lens

              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Startup delay Has significantly more startup delay
              Olympus PEN Lite E-PL3

              Olympus PEN E-PL3

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $419 body only

              $278 with 14-42mm lens

              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              Shutter lag Has slightly less shutter lag
              Built-in flash Doesn't have a built-in flash
              Startup delay Has significantly more startup delay
              Olympus PEN E-PL2

              Olympus PEN E-PL2

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $1,260 with 14-42mm lens

              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Olympus PEN E-PM1

              Olympus PEN E-PM1

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              Shutter lag Has slightly less shutter lag
              Built-in flash Doesn't have a built-in flash
              Startup delay Has slightly more startup delay
              Olympus PEN E-P1

              Olympus PEN E-P1

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $256 body only

              $279 with 14-42mm lens

              Built-in flash Doesn't have a built-in flash
              Shutter lag Has much more shutter lag
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $600 body only

              $630 with 14-45mm lens

              Battery life Has a slightly longer battery life
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Shutter lag Has slightly more shutter lag
              Olympus PEN E-PL5

              Olympus PEN E-PL5

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $438 with 14-42mm lens

              Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has significantly better image quality
              Built-in flash Doesn't have a built-in flash
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

              Olympus PEN E-PL1 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony Alpha DSLR-A300

              Sony Alpha DSLR-A300

              Entry-level DSLR

              $650 body only

              Lens availability Much more lenses available
              Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
              Autofocus Lacks video autofocus
              Movie format Does not take movies

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $349 body only

              $570 with 14-42mm lens

              HDR Has in-camera HDR
              Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Startup delay More startup delay
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $348 body only

              $290 with 14-42mm lens

              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Shutter lag Significantly less shutter lag
              Color depth Worse color depth
              Overall image quality Worse image quality

              appearance

              Olympus PEN E-PL1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
              Olympus PEN E-PL1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
              Olympus PEN E-PL1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

              discussion

              Olympus PEN E-PL1
              PEN E-PL1
              Olympus

              Report a correction
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2
              Lumix DMC-GF2
              Panasonic

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments