Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

Winner
Olympus E-520

36

Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

28

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus E-520

Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
135 ms shutter lag
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Has live view
Live view
Preview your photos
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Live view
Has live view
Preview your photos
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus E-520.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10.

competitors

Olympus E-520 Competitors

Olympus E-510

Olympus E-510

Entry-level DSLR

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Startup delay Less startup delay
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Olympus E-620

Olympus E-620

Entry-level DSLR

$799 body only

$948 with 14-42mm, 40-150mm lenses

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
True resolution Higher true resolution
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$452 body only

$397 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1

Entry-level DSLR

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Thinner
Shutter lag Much more shutter lag
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$268 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$685 body only

$748 with 14-42mm lens

Movie format Shoots movies
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder Has a digital viewfinder

discussion

Olympus E-520
E-520
Olympus

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10
Lumix DMC-L10
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments