vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus C-765 UZ

Size
Really small
Mid size 105x60x69 mm
Weight
Light-weight
310 g
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus C-750 UZ

External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Olympus C-750 UZ

Macro focus Significantly better macro capability 3 cm vs 7 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 2.3x closer to the lens
External flash Supports an external flash Yes vs No
Help
An external flash often produces better looking flash images
Olympus C-750 UZ Learn more about
the Olympus C-750 UZ

Advantages of the Olympus C-765 UZ

Screen size Larger screen 1.8" vs 1.5"
Help
Around 20% larger screen
Movie format Higher resolution movies 480p @ 15fps vs 320 x 240 @ 15fps
Help
Shoots higher resolution video
Size Slightly smaller 105x60x69 mm vs 108x66x69 mm
Help
More than 10% smaller
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor 1/2.5" 5.8x4.3mm vs 1/3" 5.3x4.0mm
Help
Around 20% larger sensor
Weight Slightly lighter 310 g vs 340 g
Help
Around 10% lighter
Placeholder Learn more about
the Olympus C-765 UZ
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent digicams, and ignoring price

Olympus C-750 UZ Olympus C-750 UZ 23

vs

25 Olympus C-765 UZ Placeholder

similarities

Compared to recent digicams

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
Digital
Light sensitivity (boost) No boost ISO Help
Lacks boost light sensitivity
True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
3.9 MP
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Screen size Very small screens Help
C-750 UZ:1.5"
C-765 UZ:1.8"
Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
CCD
Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
38 mm
Thickness Quite thick Help
2.7"
Supports RAW No RAW support Help
Less editing fidelity
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
400 ISO
Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
C-750 UZ:110k dots
C-765 UZ:114k dots
Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
C-750 UZ:2.6 fps
C-765 UZ:2.7 fps
Movie format Poor movies Help
C-750 UZ:320 x 240 @ 15fps
C-765 UZ:480p @ 15fps
Zoom Poor zoom Help
10x

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot G2

Pro digicam

Aperture Has a significantly wider aperture
Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
Weight Is slightly heavier
Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
Nikon D5200

Nikon D5200

Entry-level DSLR

$547 body only

$549 - $647 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a much larger screen
Weight Is significantly heavier
Size Is significantly larger
Canon Rebel T3i

Canon Rebel T3i

Entry-level DSLR

$499 - $648 body only

$200 - $579 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a much larger screen
Weight Is significantly heavier
Size Is significantly larger
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$200 with 18-55mm lens

Movie format Records higher quality movies
Screen size Has a much larger screen
Weight Is significantly heavier
Size Is significantly larger

Olympus C-750 UZ Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon D5100

Nikon D5100

Entry-level DSLR

$378 - $415 body only

$495 - $564 with 18-55mm lens

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger
Weight Significantly heavier
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$319 body only

$389 - $506 with 18-55mm lens

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger
Weight Heavier
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$747 body only

$650 - $847 with 18-55mm lens

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Larger
Weight Heavier
Olympus SP-810 UZ

Olympus SP-810 UZ

Super zoom

$319

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Macro focus Worse macro capability
External flash No external flash support
Olympus SP-800 UZ

Olympus SP-800 UZ

Super zoom

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Size Larger
External flash No external flash support

Olympus C-765 UZ Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Fujifilm FinePix S1000fd

Super zoom

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Slightly larger
Longest exposure Slightly shorter max exposures
Placeholder

Fujifilm FinePix S5100 Zoom

Super zoom

Macro focus Much better macro capability
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Screen size Smaller screen
Size Larger
Placeholder

Nikon Coolpix 775

Digicam

Macro focus Significantly better macro capability
Size Smaller
Screen size Smaller screen
True resolution Lower true resolution
Pentax Optio S10

Pentax Optio S10

Ultra compact

Screen size Much larger screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Longest exposure Slightly shorter max exposures
Casio Exilim EX-S5

Casio Exilim EX-S5

Digicam

Screen size Much larger screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Thickness Much thicker
Aperture Narrower aperture

appearance

Olympus C-750 UZ Placeholder
Olympus C-750 UZ
Olympus C-750 UZ

discussion

Showing 0 comments