Updated (July, 2012): Compare the Olympus XZ-1 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

vs

Olympus XZ-1

47

Olympus XZ-1

Runner-up
     
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
310 ms shutter lag
Battery life
Great battery life
400 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-1

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Olympus XZ-1

Report a correction
Screen type Has an OLED screen OLED vs LCD
Help
OLED screens are often brighter and more vibrant than typical LCD screens
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera Yes vs No
Help
Stitches together multiple photos for a wide perspective
Aperture Wider aperture f/1.8 vs f/2.0
Help
At its widest zoom, the XZ-1's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen 614k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 30% higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 6,400 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The XZ-1's maximum light sensitivity is 1 f-stop better
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster 7 fps vs 6 fps
Help
Around 20% faster continuous shooting
Lowest price Cheaper $499.99 vs $599.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $99 cheaper (around 20% less)
Olympus XZ-1 Learn more about
the Olympus XZ-1

Advantages of the Panasonic DMC-LX5

Report a correction
Wide angle Better wide angle 24 mm vs 28 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Overall image quality Better image quality 41.0 vs 34.0
Help
More than 20% better image quality
Image stabilization Better image stabilization Lens vs Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Dynamic range More dynamic range 10.8 EV vs 10.4 EV
Help
0.4 f-stops more dynamic range
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO 12,800 ISO vs None
Help
Allows taking photos in darker situations, often at the cost of additional noise in the image
Battery life Longer battery life 400 shots vs 320 shots
Help
Around 30% more shots per battery charge
Color depth Better color depth 19.6 bits vs 18.8 bits
Help
Distinguishes 0.8 more bits of color
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO 132 ISO vs 117 ISO
Help
The DMC-LX5 has a slight edge (0.2 f-stops) in low noise, high ISO performance
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Learn more about
the Panasonic DMC-LX5
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent pro digicams, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Olympus XZ-1 Olympus XZ-1 47
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        50 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              Aperture Very wide aperture Help
              XZ-1:f/1.8
              DMC-LX5:f/2.0
              Sensor size Large sensors Help
              1/1.6" 8.3x6.2mm
              Supports RAW RAW support Help
              Better editing
              Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
              1 cm
              External flash Support external flash Help
              Better lighting
              Longest exposure Long exposures Help
              60 seconds
              Lowest price Very expensive Help
              XZ-1:$499.99
              DMC-LX5:$599.00
              Viewfinder No viewfinders Help
              Can only preview photos on the screen
              Dynamic range Poor dynamic range Help
              XZ-1:10.4 EV
              DMC-LX5:10.8 EV
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Color depth Poor color depth Help
              XZ-1:18.8 bits
              DMC-LX5:19.6 bits
              Low light performance Above average noise at high ISO Help
              XZ-1:117 ISO
              DMC-LX5:132 ISO
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Overall image quality Low image quality Help
              XZ-1:34.0
              DMC-LX5:41.0
              Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
              720p @ 30fps
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              XZ-1:4x
              DMC-LX5:3.8x

              Compared to recent pro digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              Light sensitivity (boost) One has boost ISO Help
              XZ-1:None
              DMC-LX5:12,800 ISO
              True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
              10 MP
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Supports 24p No support for 24p Help
              Missing that film look
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
              Not supported
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              XZ-1:6,400 ISO
              DMC-LX5:3,200 ISO
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              XZ-1:7 fps
              DMC-LX5:6 fps
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              XZ-1:614k dots
              DMC-LX5:460k dots

              dxomark

              DXOMark

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

              Pro digicam

              $348 - $370

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Startup delay Has much more startup delay
              Sensor size Has a marginally smaller sensor
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

              Pro digicam

              $329

              Supports 24p Records movies in 24p
              Lowest price Is slightly less expensive
              Shutter lag Has much more shutter lag
              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

              Pro digicam

              $498

              Sensor size Has a much larger sensor
              Low light performance Is significantly less noisy at high ISO
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Canon Powershot S100

              Canon Powershot S100

              Pro digicam

              $200 - $400

              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Fujifilm Finepix X10

              Fujifilm Finepix X10

              Pro digicam

              $360 - $574

              Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              Screen size Has a slightly smaller screen
              Canon PowerShot S95

              Canon PowerShot S95

              Pro digicam

              $320

              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Dynamic range Has slightly wider dynamic range
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash
              Fujifilm XF1

              Fujifilm XF1

              Pro digicam

              $220

              Low light performance Is slightly less noisy at high ISO
              Overall image quality Has slightly better image quality
              Longest exposure Slightly shorter exposures
              External flash Doesn't support an external flash

              Olympus XZ-1 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Olympus XZ-2 iHS

              Pro digicam

              $299

              Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Sensor size Smaller sensor
              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Olympus Stylus XZ-10

              Pro digicam

              $176 - $399

              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Touch screen Has a touch screen
              Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
              Sensor size Significantly smaller sensor

              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Canon PowerShot G12

              Canon PowerShot G12

              Pro digicam

              $509

              Supports 24p Supports 24p
              Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
              Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
              Wide angle Worse wide angle
              Leica D-LUX 5

              Leica D-LUX 5

              Pro digicam

              $975

              Size Smaller
              Thickness Thinner
              Continuous shooting Shoots slower
              Lowest price Significantly more expensive

              appearance

              Olympus XZ-1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
              Olympus XZ-1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
              Olympus XZ-1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

              discussion

              Olympus XZ-1
              XZ-1
              Olympus

              Report a correction
              Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5
              Lumix DMC-LX5
              Panasonic

              Report a correction

              Showing 11 comments

              Arxin (2:56 PM, September 20, 2011)
              Maybe xz-1 is more cheaper.
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (1:12 PM, July 04, 2011)
              Hi Rostislav, thanks for the feedback!  You have some good points.
              Snapsort uses image quality benchmarks from DxOMark, and these benchmarks are based on RAW image quality only, so perhaps that might account for the difference?   Good point also about the aperture at the telephoto end, you can compare these on the specs page.  I think we wanted to include this in our comparisons, but had not yet come up with a good way to compare them given huge the difference in telephoto focal lengths you'd often see.
               
              Avatar for Rostislav Alexandrovich Rostislav Alexandrovich (8:27 AM, July 04, 2011)
              Dear Snapsort,
              I am puzzeld why you belive the LX-5 have better IQ then xz-1,
              every review i've read puts it ahead of LX5, infact, pro photographers reviwers such steve huff and luminous landscape rate the XZ-1 as the best IQ in a compact, especiall if you consider the DOF ability.

              Also you failed to mention the biggest asset of XZ-1 vs every other compact ever made,
              its aperture advantage is at the long end f2.5, compared to lx5's 3.3, thats almost a stop faster&fastest there is today,
              combine the longer reach of 112mm and the f2.5 aperture - you get same kind of bokeh (dof) as a mft or aps-c camera with a 18-55 f3.5/5.6 zoom kit!
              as mentioned at page 8 dpreview xz-1 review.

              Hope i've helped to make this site better.
               
              Leo (3:22 AM, April 26, 2011)
              I have both cameras, LX5 first and XZ1 later. Both lenses are excellent, but different. Regarding the specs list hereabove for you the LX5 is the winner. But for me, now after a month use of both, the Xz1 is a much better camera because of its faser lens, its more convenient zoom range, better focusing in macro mode, better screen and easier use.
              I don't buy a camera like this for videos, so I only consider photographic application.
              I did not use the 24mm wide angle with the lx5 as it deforms the persons too much, or it flattens the mountains, so you have to zoom in most cases loosing speed of the lens. If I need a wide angle panorama, I use the panorama option assembling 3 pictures of the xz1, which works perfectly.
              I was desappointed by the LX5 colours especially in artificial light conditions: with usual white balance settings the pictures were too yellow. I had to test many adjustments before finding acceptable colours, so I missed a lot of shots. The xz1 colours are generally better.
              The buttons of the LX5 on the lens ring are easy to unset without you remark it.
              The xz1 was delivered with a separate charger, so you don't need a pc to charge the batterie. T charge the panasonic, you must take the battery out of the camera, I don't like that.
              In conclusion I would say the LX5 has an intellectual approach, the Olympus XZ1 has an intelligent approach. In practice I have far the best pictures with the XZ1.
               
              Leo (2:09 PM, April 12, 2011)
              I have both now, LX5 and XZ1. The use of XZ1 is much easier. Its fast lens is excellent, the zoom range is very convenient, I did not use the 24mm angle of the LX5 so often, for me 28mm is wide enough. It is much easier to obtain sharp macro pictures with the XZ1. And the XZ1 colours especially with artificial light are better. Even if the LX5 has more dedicated buttons as for iso setting, their use is less friendly. It seems the image quality is better with LX5, but is it less easy to obtain nice pictures than with the XZ1.
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (3:40 PM, April 05, 2011)
              The ZS7 generally takes great shots. Where you would see a difference I think is if you increase the ISO, which you'd need to do to shoot in lower light without a flash, then the image quality on the XZ-1 or LX5 would be much better than the ZS7.

              For advanced users, the LX5 and XZ-1 also give you RAW capabilities to give you more editing control over your photo, wider apertures which get you more light and shallower depth of field, and more manual controls making it easier to get the photo you want.
               
              Hello2me (8:06 AM, April 05, 2011)
              I'm thinking about buying a new point and shoot soon but I wanted to know if I primarily take outdoor photos and just sometime indoor... will the photos really look different between these high end compact and say something like the zs7? I mean like when I take the same photos with the 2 different cameras in your opinion is there a difference enough to warrant the extra money?
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (1:17 PM, March 24, 2011)
              Snapsort recommends the LX5, because is has better image quality, a wider angle lens, higher ISO, better image stabilizations and is $100 cheaper.
               
              Grapekar (4:12 AM, March 24, 2011)
              please give me some idea for this two camera.. which one better?
               
              Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (3:32 PM, March 23, 2011)
              The DXOMark scores are fairly close. DXOMark also only tests the RAW capability of the camera, and their tests are designed to benchmark the sensor exclusively, but other components of the camera can influence image quality.

              DXOMark is a good starting point, but if reviewers are rating the XZ1 as having better image quality than the LX5 they are probably right.
               
              whatsup (5:42 AM, March 23, 2011)
              So how come many test report says that xz1 picture quality is better than LX5, but according to the info on DXOMark the scores says 20% better image quality for the LX5? The scores and what people say are different... how come?