Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 vs Olympus XZ-1

Tie
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

40

Olympus XZ-1

39

Tie

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Great battery life
Battery life
380 shots
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus XZ-1

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus XZ-1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5

Pro digicam

$599

Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
Supports 24p No 24p support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Pro digicam

$426

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
3D Takes 3D photos
Supports 24p No 24p support
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$579 - $798

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Built-in flash No built-in flash

Olympus XZ-1 Competitors

Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Pro digicam

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Pro digicam

$199

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Overall image quality Much better image quality
Sensor size Significantly larger sensor
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
Lumix DMC-LX3
Panasonic

Report a correction
Olympus XZ-1
XZ-1
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments