Olympus TG310 vs Olympus Stylus Tough-3000

Tie
Olympus TG-310

63

Olympus Stylus Tough-3000

63

Tie

Reasons to buy the Olympus TG310

Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
670 ms shutter lag
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Stylus Tough-3000

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Olympus TG-310. Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Olympus Stylus Tough-3000.

differences

Advantages of the Olympus TG310

Report a correction
Size
Slightly smaller
96x63x22 mm vs 95x65x23 mm
Help
Almost the same
Thickness
Slightly thinner
0.9" vs 0.9"
Help
Almost the same
Olympus TG-310 Learn more about
the Olympus TG310

Advantages of the Olympus Tough-3000

Report a correction
Snapsort is not aware of any important advantages of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs the Olympus TG310.
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Learn more about
the Olympus Tough-3000
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent waterproof cameras, and ignoring price

Olympus TG-310 Olympus TG310 63
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        63 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent compacts

              Common Strengths
              Size Fairly small Help
              TG31096x63x22 mm
              Tough-300095x65x23 mm
              Waterproof Waterproof Help
              Great at the beach
              Thickness Thin Help
              0.9"
              Weight Light weight Help
              TG310155 g
              Tough-3000159 g
              Common Weaknesses
              Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
              You could stitch photos in post
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              1,600 ISO
              HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
              You could do HDR manually
              Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
              28 mm
              Image stabilization Poor image stabilization Help
              Sensor shift
              Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
              720p @ 30fps
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              230k dots
              Screen size Very small screens Help
              2.7"
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              3.6x
              Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
              f/3.5

              Compared to recent waterproof cameras

              Common Strengths

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              Common Weaknesses
              GPS No built-in GPS Help
              Missing geo-tagging
              High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
              Not supported

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

              Olympus Tough TG-850 iHS

              Waterproof

              $160

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Wide angle Has a much wider wide angle lens
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is significantly heavier
              Olympus TG-320

              Olympus Tough TG-320

              Waterproof

              Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
              3D Captures 3D images
              Continuous shooting Doesn't shoot as fast continuously
              Olympus TG-610

              Olympus TG-610

              Waterproof

              Screen size Has a slightly larger screen
              Screen resolution Has a much higher resolution screen
              Fastest shutter speed Has a slower max shutter speed
              Thickness Is thicker
              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Canon ELPH 310 HS

              Travel zoom

              $258

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Waterproof Is not waterproof
              Fujifilm FinePix XP50

              Fujifilm FinePix XP50

              Waterproof

              $189

              Movie format Records higher quality movies
              Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
              Thickness Is thicker
              Macro focus Much worse macro focusing
              Olympus Stylus Tough 6020

              Olympus Stylus Tough 6020

              Waterproof

              Weight Is slightly lighter
              Aperture Has a slightly narrower aperture
              Olympus Stylus 7030

              Olympus Stylus 7030

              Compact

              $214

              Aperture Has a slightly wider aperture
              Waterproof Is not waterproof
              Thickness Is thicker

              Olympus TG-310 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Ricoh WG-20

              Ricoh WG-20

              Waterproof

              $132 - $149

              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
              Size Larger
              Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
              Olympus TG-630 iHS

              Olympus TG-630 iHS

              Waterproof

              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Continuous shooting Shoots slightly slower
              Placeholder

              Canon PowerShot A310

              Compact

              Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
              Screen size Much smaller screen
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Samsung AQ100

              Samsung AQ100

              Waterproof

              Size Smaller
              Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
              Wide angle Much worse wide angle
              Image stabilization No image stabilization

              Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

              Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

              Waterproof

              $573

              Size Smaller
              Macro focus Better macro capability
              Aperture Narrower aperture
              Weight Heavier
              Olympus Stylus Tough 6000

              Olympus Stylus Tough 6000

              Waterproof

              $247

              Image stabilization Better image stabilization
              Size Smaller
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Weight Heavier
              GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

              GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

              Waterproof

              Movie format Higher resolution movies
              Wide angle Much better wide angle
              Built-in flash No built-in flash
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Nikon 1 J1

              Nikon 1 J1

              Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

              $189 with 10-30mm lens

              High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
              Autofocus Faster autofocus
              Image stabilization No image stabilization
              Size Larger

              appearance

              Olympus TG-310 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
              Olympus TG-310 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
              Olympus TG-310 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000

              discussion

              Olympus TG-310
              TG310
              Olympus

              Report a correction
              Olympus Stylus Tough-3000
              Stylus Tough-3000
              Olympus

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments