Updated (March 2011): Compare the Olympus Tough TG-810 vs Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Olympus Tough TG-810 vs Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Winner
Olympus Tough TG-810

70

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

63

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus Tough TG-810

Large screen
Screen size
3"
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
920k dots
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Stylus Tough 8010

Size
Really small
Compact (95×62×22 mm)

galleries

Explore our gallery of 2 sample photos taken by the Olympus Tough TG-810.

competitors

Olympus Tough TG-810 Competitors

Olympus TG-610

Olympus TG-610

Waterproof

$439

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Weight Lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TF1

Waterproof

$287

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen size Much smaller screen
Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$124 - $179

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger

Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 Competitors

Olympus Stylus 1030 SW

Olympus Stylus 1030 SW

Waterproof

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Slightly smaller
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020

Olympus Stylus Tough 6020

Waterproof

Weight Significantly lighter
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000

Olympus Stylus Tough 8000

Waterproof

$300

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Aperture Wider aperture
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Olympus Tough TG-810
Tough TG-810
Olympus

Report a correction
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010
Stylus Tough 8010
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 2 comments

Avatar for Snapsort Snapsort (7:55 PM, August 08, 2011)
If you are referring to the resolution, then that is because Snapsort uses True Resolution, which is based on the size of the cameras sensor: http://snapsort.com/learn/sensor/true-resolution
 
Avatar for Pedro Beça aka Zoink Pedro Beça aka Zoink (10:56 AM, August 08, 2011)
Hi.

The information about 8010 is no totally correct, look at:
http://www.olympus.pt/consumer/208_comparecameras.aspx?mode=result&pId1=N4298792&pId2=N3836492