Updated (February 2011): Compare the Olympus SZ-10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Olympus SZ10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

54

Olympus SZ-10

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus SZ10

Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Macro focus
Great macro
1.0 cm
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45

Travel zoom

$159

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ60

Travel zoom

$251

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Olympus SZ-10 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810

Super zoom

$220

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$360 - $448

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Much larger
Olympus SZ-11

Olympus SZ-11

Digicam

$190

Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Macro focus Worse macro capability

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Olympus SZ-10
SZ10
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments