Updated (March 2011): Compare the Olympus SZ-30MR vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 vs Olympus SZ-30MR

Winner
Placeholder

55
Placeholder

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10

Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus SZ-30MR

Sensor type
 CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
More detailed differences and similarities →

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS10 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$699 body only

$449 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Supports 24p Supports 24p
GPS No built-in GPS
Compare the EOS Rebel T6 vs the Lumix DMC-ZS10
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Travel zoom

$636

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Longest exposure Much shorter max exposures
Compare the Lumix ZS20 vs the Lumix DMC-ZS10
Placeholder

Leica D-Lux 3

Pro digicam

$1,499

Aperture Wider aperture
Sensor size Slightly larger sensor
GPS No built-in GPS
Compare the D-Lux 3 vs the Lumix DMC-ZS10

Olympus SZ-30MR Competitors

Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75

Compact

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Compare the Lumix DMC-FX75 vs the SZ-30MR
Placeholder

Olympus SZ-31MR

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Compare the SZ-31MR vs the SZ-30MR
Placeholder

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$412

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Aperture Narrower aperture
Compare the Coolpix S7000 vs the SZ-30MR
More detailed differences and similarities →

discussion

Placeholder
Lumix DMC-ZS10
Panasonic

Report a correction
Placeholder
SZ-30MR
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments

More detailed differences and similarities →