Olympus PEN E-PM2 vs Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Winner
Olympus PEN E-PM2

100

Sony Alpha NEX-3N

86

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus PEN E-PM2

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
108 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha NEX-3N

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Battery life
Great battery life
480 shots
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus PEN E-PM2.
Explore our gallery of 19 sample photos taken by the Sony Alpha NEX-3N.

competitors

Olympus PEN E-PM2 Competitors

Fujifilm X-A1

Fujifilm X-A1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Touch screen No touch screen
Olympus PEN E-PM1

Olympus PEN E-PM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Touch screen No touch screen
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$106 body only

$280 with 14mm lens

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Sony Alpha NEX-3N Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life
GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

Waterproof

$429

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports 24p No 24p support
Sony NEX-5N

Sony NEX 5N

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Built-in flash No built-in flash

discussion

Olympus PEN E-PM2
PEN E-PM2
Olympus

Report a correction
Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Alpha NEX-3N
Sony

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments