Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III vs Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

96

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

58

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Shoots UHD movies
Movie format
UHD @ 30fps
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II

Size
Really small
Standard size (124×85×45 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.71x

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Size Much smaller
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 (Lumix DMC-FZ2000)

Super zoom

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weight Lighter
Aperture Narrower aperture
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV

Super zoom

$1,698

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Larger

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 - $2,049 body only

$1,998 with 12-40mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Sony a7 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,876 - $1,998 body only

$2,116 - $2,198 with 28-70mm lens

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Larger
Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$511 - $899 body only

$999 with 14-150mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Battery life Longer battery life
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Sony

Report a correction
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II
OM-D E-M5 II
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments