Olympus OM-D E-M10 vs Olympus SZ-30MR

Winner
Olympus OM-D E-M10

49

Olympus SZ-30MR

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M10

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,400k dots
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus SZ-30MR

Weight
Light-weight
246 g
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Digital
  2. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Olympus OM-D E-M10.

competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M10 Competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$600 - $899 body only

$999 with 14-150mm lens

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 - $548 body only

$490 - $648 with 16-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000

Entry-level DSLR

$3,532 with 18-105mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Built-in focus motor Has a built-in focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Olympus SZ-30MR Competitors

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS

Olympus Stylus SZ-16 iHS

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Fastest shutter speed Faster max shutter speed
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ40

Super zoom

$220

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Canon PowerShot SX270 HS

Travel zoom

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Olympus OM-D E-M10
OM-D E-M10
Olympus

Report a correction
Olympus SZ-30MR
SZ-30MR
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments