Olympus OM-D E-M10 III vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Placeholder
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Really small
Size
Standard size (122×84×50 mm)
Thin
Thickness
2"
Light-weight
Weight
410 g
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Size Slightly smaller
Thickness Slightly thinner
Focus points Slightly fewer focus points
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 - $600 body only

$699 - $725 with 15-45mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$799 - $899 body only

$900 - $999 with 16-50mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$468 body only

$498 - $539 with 14-42mm lens

Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Viewfinder size Larger viewfinder
Size Smaller
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$500 - $549 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Lens availability Much more lenses available
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Placeholder
OM-D E-M10 III
Olympus

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85
Lumix DMC-G85
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments