Olympus OM-D E-M10 III vs Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S

Placeholder
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S

Screen size
Large screen
3.2"
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,620k dots
Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.81x
Light sensitivity
High ISO
204,800 ISO

competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,499 body only

$1,899 with 18-55mm lens

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$630 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 - $500 body only

$550 - $600 with 15-45mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,499 body only

$1,899 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen size Much smaller screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-LX100 II

Boutique

$998

Longest exposure Much longer exposures
True resolution Higher true resolution
Screen size Much smaller screen
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV

Pro DSLR

$2,234 - $2,799 body only

$2,949 - $3,549 with 24-70mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

discussion

Placeholder
OM-D E-M10 III
Olympus

Report a correction
Placeholder
Lumix DC-GH5S
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments