Sony Alpha A6000 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Sony Alpha A6000
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Lens availability
Slightly more lenses available
108 lenses
Longest exposure
Long exposures
60 seconds
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$698 - $748 body only

$811 - $848 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Weight Heavier
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,198 body only

$1,598 with 18-135mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Competitors

Placeholder

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Focus points Slightly more focus points
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$649 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,149 - $1,411 body only

$1,719 - $1,797 with 24-120mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
OM-D E-M10 II
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments