differences

Advantages of the Olympus E-M10 II

Report a correction
Size
Slightly smaller
120×83×47 mm vs 122×84×50 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Thickness
Slightly thinner
1.9" vs 2"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Weight
Slightly lighter
390 g vs 410 g
Help
Almost the same
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Learn more about
the Olympus E-M10 II

Advantages of the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Report a correction
Focus points
Slightly more focus points
121 vs 81
Help
Set focus accurately within the frame
Continuous shooting
Shoots slightly faster
8.6 fps vs 8 fps
Help
Around 10% faster continuous shooting
Placeholder Learn more about
the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about either the E-M10 II or the OM-D E-M10 III.

similarities

Compared to recent mirrorless cameras

Common Strengths
Lens availability Many lenses available Help
108 lenses
Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
Digital
Longest exposure Long exposures Help
60 seconds
Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
External flash not needed
Common Weaknesses
External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
Autofocus Slower contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
15.9 MP
Weather sealed Neither is weather sealed Help
Need to shelter it from weather
Focus points Few focus points Help
E-M10 II81
OM-D E-M10 III121
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
25,600 ISO
Viewfinder size Below average viewfinder size Help
0.59x

appearance

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Placeholder

discussion

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
OM-D E-M10 II
Olympus

Report a correction
Placeholder
OM-D E-M10 III
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments