differences

Advantages of the Olympus E-M10 II

Report a correction
Size
Slightly smaller
120×83×47 mm vs 122×84×50 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Thickness
Slightly thinner
1.9" vs 2"
Help
Around 10% thinner
Weight
Slightly lighter
390 g vs 410 g
Help
Almost the same
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Learn more about
the Olympus E-M10 II

Advantages of the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Report a correction
Focus points
Slightly more focus points
121 vs 81
Help
Set focus accurately within the frame
Placeholder Learn more about
the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III
vs

recommendations

Snapsort can't make a recommendation (yet) because it doesn't have enough data yet about either the E-M10 II or the OM-D E-M10 III.

similarities

Compared to recent mirrorless cameras

Common Strengths
Lens availability Many lenses available Help
108 lenses
Longest exposure Long exposures Help
60 seconds
Weight Light weight Help
E-M10 II390 g
OM-D E-M10 III410 g
Thickness Thin Help
E-M10 II1.9"
OM-D E-M10 III2"
Built-in flash Each has a built-in flash Help
External flash not needed
Common Weaknesses
Autofocus Slower contrast detection autofocus Help
slower focusing
External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
Limited to the in-camera mic
True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
15.9 MP
Weather sealed Neither is weather sealed Help
Need to shelter it from weather
Focus points Few focus points Help
E-M10 II81
OM-D E-M10 III121
Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
25,600 ISO
Viewfinder size Below average viewfinder size Help
0.59x

appearance

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Placeholder

discussion

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
OM-D E-M10 II
Olympus

Report a correction
Placeholder
OM-D E-M10 III
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments